Democrats advertised for another woman in the Kavanaugh case and they got one They needed another woman to come forward – since Blasey Ford’s case was falling apart.

Home  »  Conspiracies  »  Democrats advertised for another woman in the Kavanaugh case and they got one
Print This Post Print This Post
Sep 24, 2018 No Comments ›› admin

By Lynn Woolley

This column will likely be outdated by the time it’s posted given how fast things are changing in the Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination case.

Case in point: Columnist Marc Thiessen wrote a column stating “no other women have come forward…” On the same day that column ran in my local paper, headlines were blaring that a woman named Deborah Ramirez is now claiming that Kavanaugh thrust his male member at her at yet another drunken dorm party.

Protesters line up in front of the Supreme Court on 9/24/18 after the “second woman” story appeared (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

I’m not buying it.

I’m not a Kavanaugh fan, but it’s suspicious when one woman’s story doesn’t seem to be enough to bork the nomination – the media begs for more accusers – and one steps up.

I don’t believe or disbelieve Blasey Ford, but she has no evidence. As for Ramirez, I do not believe her at all. I think she simply answered her party’s call when they needed a second accuser.

Kavanaugh’s calendars.

People make fun of me in these days of electronic calendars because I still maintain – and keep – a written calendar each year.

I have them back to the 70’s – including reporters’ notebooks that I used when covering stories. This is what I used to write a memoir called “The Last Great Days of Radio.” With all my notes and calendars, I knew exactly when I had interviewed certain people – like Ronald Reagan and John Tower – and often, I even had the scripts of the stories I called in to WFAA and KRLD.

It seems that Judge Kavanaugh also kept written calendars – and that he kept his as well. It also seems the calendars do not show him attending parties at the time that Ford claimed he tried to assault her. In a case with zero evidence, this may be the best indicator that he is telling the truth.

If he is, then Blasey Ford is a liar. If she is a liar, I would not put much stock in the veracity of Deborah Ramirez.

This entire circus is about keeping Kavanaugh off the court because of abortion.

It is unlikely that a Court with Kavanaugh on it is going to overturn the unconstitutional “law” known as Roe v Wade.

But Democrats aren’t taking any chances with a “a woman’s right to kill an unborn child.” If they bork Kavanaugh over abortion – they also get revenge for the Merrick Garland passover that was engineered by Republicans near the end of Obama’s presidency.

They consider all this “war.” To win the war, they needed another woman to come forward – since Blasey Ford’s case was falling apart. So they advertised, begged, and cajoled – and they got one. The fact that she is no more credible than Blasey Ford is beside the point.

lynn@BeLogical.com

Tagged with: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

%d bloggers like this: