Mueller shakes up Washington & Hillary should be worried If Mueller is honest & takes this investigation in any direction it leads, the Clintons have reason to be worried.

Home  »  Conspiracies  »  Mueller shakes up Washington & Hillary should be worried
Print This Post Print This Post
Oct 31, 2017 No Comments ›› admin

By Lynn Woolley

It all depends on what kind of a prosecutor Robert Mueller is. If – as some suspect from the four Democratic donors on his staff—he is out to get President Trump, then the Clintons might rest easy.

Hillary Clinton & Special Counsel Robert Mueller (USApoliticalreview.com)

If Mueller is honest and takes this investigation in any direction it leads, the Clintons have reason to be worried.

Frankly, I don’t know. I have called for Mueller to resign because of his conflicts of interest. He ran the FBI for a dozen years – now, he should be investigating it for its role in the Steele Dossier.

Beyond that, he is known to be looking into Tony Podesta and his giant lobbying firm. Podesta is the brother of John Podesta – a big Washington liberal who ran Hillary’s campaign. The trail – so far – leads as much or more to the Clintons as it does to President trump. The final outcome may depend on whether Mueller is ideologically neutral.

Tony Podesta, in 2004, is handing over full operational and financial control to longtime firm CEO Kimberley Fritts, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the meeting. | Jacqueline Larma/AP

Theory #1: Manafort is a pawn.

This hypothesis has been floating around for as long as the Russian Collusion story has been on CNN. It holds that Mueller is playing hardball by indicting Manafort and his business partner Richard Gates to intimidate them into betraying Trump in some manner. This supposes that Manafort and Gates have incriminating evidence against Trump.

The possibilities are that they have dirt on Trump but will not spill it, they have nothing at all on Trump, or they have nothing but tell Mueller what he wants to hear in return for leniency.

Theory #2: Mueller has put Washington on notice.

This one – I like!

If Trump has broken laws in connection with the Russians – let the impeachment begin. It’s just that there is no evidence so far. There is evidence against Manafort and Gates that led to their indictments on charges not related to the collusion case. They got a low-level campaign worker, George Papadopoulos for lying to investigators. There is a weak Trump connection, but not much for Mueller work with.

But think about this: who in Washington of either party has been cooperating with or working for the Russians? Tony Podesta? Oops, he’s a Democrat with major ties to Hillary Clinton. Who else? We might find out if the Uranium One story is on Mueller’s radar. That sent 20 percent of U.S. uranium into Russian control, and about $145,000,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton got a $500,000 speech out of it and a meeting with Vladimir Putin. Collusion? It’s up to Robert Mueller!

It makes me wonder about ALL members of Congress, the bureaucratic state, agencies like the FBI (which is now suspected of paying part of the bill for the Steele Dossier), and the K-Street lobbyists. This is “the Swamp” and you can include media like the Washington Post, the New York Times, and CNN.

I’ll bet that Trump’s having colluded with Russia is no more likely than the Clintons and many other swamp dwellers you can name. When Mueller indicted Manafort, he was essentially indicting The Swamp. Lots of people in D.C. have reason to be worried. Maybe Mueller will drain the Swamp.

Theory #3: The REAL colluders are the Clintons, the DNC and the FBI.

That’s a broad brush – but it makes more sense than O.J.’s search for the Real Killers.

Going back to Obama’s live-mic gaffe about having more “flexibility” to do Putin’s bidding after his reelection. The Democrats have had a love affair with Russia. Obama chided Mitt Romney for calling Russia our biggest geopolitical adversary. Bernie Sanders honeymooned in Russia. Hillary worked on a “Russian reset.”

The Democrats started hating Russia at about 9:30 p.m. on November 8th, 2016.

Add to this the aforementioned Uranium One deal, the Clinton Foundation’s selling of access that included the high-priced speech in Russia, the FBI’s involvement with Fusion GPS on the Dossier – and you have a scenario where the entire collusion story might be turned on its heels.

Video: PBS Newshour – Do Mueller’s first indictments change anything politically?

It’s all on Mueller’s shoulders.

Who is this guy? What are his politics – and can he set them aside? Is his investigation a sham designed to “get” Donald Trump? Is he working on the original crime – or simply looking for people he can trap? If the trail leads to the Clintons, will he follow it? Will he indict Tony Podesta? Will he investigate whether the Dossier led to the “unmasking” of people close to Trump? Can he investigate an agency that he ran for 12 years? Or should he step down and let a non-partisan prosecutor take over – one who has not been FBI Director?

These are the questions we should be asking. You can bet Bill and Hillary Clinton are asking them.

lynn@BeLogical.com

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

%d bloggers like this: