Al-Qaeda’s 9/11 Mastermind says MUSLIM IMMIGRATION is Way To Victory Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Says Terrorism Isn't the way to Victory; Political Jihad IS

Home  »  Democrats  »  Al-Qaeda’s 9/11 Mastermind says MUSLIM IMMIGRATION is Way To Victory
Print This Post Print This Post
Nov 24, 2016 No Comments ›› admin

By Ben Barrack

KSM: Political Jihad / Immigration better than terrorism.

KSM: Political Jihad / Immigration better than terrorism.

Thanks to a soon-to-be released book by a CIA Contractor who interrogated Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) after the 9/11 attacks, we now know the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan for overthrowing the United States government. That plan is mass Muslim immigration invasion.

In the book, author James Mitchell relays conversations he had with KSM, via Washington Examiner (note how KSM refers to Muslims as “brothers”, which is shorthand for Muslim Brotherhood):

“It would be nice,” he (KSM) said, if al Qaeda or like-minded Islamists could bring America to its knees with catastrophic attacks, but that was unlikely to happen; “not practical” is the wording he used. From his perspective, the long war for Islamic domination wasn’t going to be won in the streets with bombs and bullets and bloodshed. No, it would be won in the minds of the American people.

He said the terror attacks were good, but the “practical” way to defeat America was through immigration and by outbreeding non-Muslims. He said jihadi-minded brothers would immigrate into the United States, taking advantage of the welfare system to support themselves while they spread their jihadi message. They will wrap themselves in America’s rights and laws for protection, ratchet up acceptance of Sharia law, and then, only when they were strong enough, rise up and violently impose Sharia from within. He said the brothers would relentlessly continue their attacks and the American people eventually would become so tired, so frightened, and so weary of war that they would just want it to end.

As can be seen, this is exactly in line with what is stated in the 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document that was recovered by the FBI in 2004. In it, the plan to overthrow America from within involves destroying the U.S. “by their (own) hands and the hands of the believers…”, which is exactly what KSM advocates through Muslim immigration, allowed by politicians (Ikhwan is Arabic for Muslim Brotherhood):


For some reason, Americans – especially those inside the Beltway – have been incapable of understanding the Islamic threat. While the political leaders only discuss stopping acts of terrorism and stopping terrorists, the more dangerous players and tactics are ignored. In the case of Huma Abedin, espionage and usurpation of the U.S. Constitution is allowed to take place openly, in plain sight. In many cases, Republican leaders have defended her. Republican nominees for President when Trump called for a ban on Muslim refugees into the U.S. all denounced Trump, proving that none of them truly understands the threat. Huma shared their view.

Huma was caught on video last year calling for the mass invasion of Syrian Muslim refugees into the U.S., which is exactly what KSM called for (h/t Project Veritas):

This view was reflected in Hillary’s desire to see a 550% increase in Syrian refugees being allowed into the U.S. had she won the presidency.

It’s also a view that is quite interesting when juxtaposed with those expressed by Huma’s father Syed Abedin in 1971. At the time, Syed called for the implementation of Sharia law in all Muslim countries and for the expulsion of western influence. In essence, Syed was very intolerant of diversity. Yet, Huma is in support of the Muslim invasion of America in the name of diversity.

This power and influence of people like Huma is far more dangerous to America than terrorist bombings.

Huma’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria was also revealed in one of Hillary’s emails released earlier this year.

Muslims like Huma and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) – who is being discussed as the next DNC Chairman – are far more dangerous; they are political jihadists, not terrorists per se.

An internet rumor from 2008 suggested that Barack Obama was sworn in as President on a Qur’an. That was not true. However, in 2006, Ellison – the first Muslim elected to the U.S. Congress – WAS sworn in on a Qur’an, Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an actually. Doing so allowed Ellison to have it both ways. Yeah, he was doing something controversial by using a Qur’an but it belonged to the third President of the U.S. What was not reported was the reason Jefferson owned a Qur’an. It was to study his enemy, the Barbary pirates who were kidnapping Americans on the high Mediterranean seas and beheading many of them.

The U.S. Marines were formed in response to the Barbary pirates and wore leather on their necks (leathernecks) to prevent being beheaded “on the shores of Tripoli”.

By being sworn in on the Qur’an, Ellison chose the side of the Barbary pirates and stuck his thumb in the eye of America generally, Jefferson specifically.


Check out this chilling audio on election night in 2006. A local news station captured the crowd chanting ‘Allahu Akbar’ as Ellison was delivering a victory speech. Once the crowd did so, the control room quickly cut back to the news desk:

Ellison has ties to Muslim Brotherhood organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Hamas, which makes him far more dangerous than KSM because of the political power he holds. If he becomes the chairman of one of America’s two political parties, he’ll have a whole lot more.

The biggest Islamic threat to America is that the lesser threat (terrorists) are treated as the greater threat. The greater Islamic threat (political jihad) is ignored.

Tagged with: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

%d bloggers like this: